Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up THE PRICE TAG ON Vaporizers?

vaping online

Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up THE PRICE TAG ON Vaporizers?

The U.S. tobacco industry is fighting back against efforts by state regulatory bodies and consumers to modify the sale of electric cigarettes. While vaporizers have already been around for quite some time and so are becoming more acceptable in mainstream American life, the tobacco companies are determined to fight these efforts vigorously. They’ve made millions of dollars attempting to defeat state taxing and regulation efforts. Now, they’re making their next move: challenging the legality of the taxation themselves. In a new legal filing, they’re claiming that the FDA over regulates and creates a “guaranteed” interstate transportation business. The filing happens to be being contested in the courts, and both sides expect a resolution at some point soon.

State taxation uprights vaporizers by regulating their sale. It is estimated that about twenty states have uprights to market vaporizer devices, including California, Colorado, D.C., Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Washington. These states have grown rapidly in recent years, so when a result, their cigarette tax rates may also be growing rapidly. Many of these same states likewise have placed taxes on cigar and pipe tobacco. It appears that smoking just gets more expensive, and that’s what the tobacco industry is shooting for.

Based on the filing Element Vape Coupon with the FDA, the tobacco industry has been targeted unfairly. The tobacco industry does everything they can to fight against regulation of vaporizer devices. As we’ve seen, the U.S. Supreme Court has multiple times ruled against the FDA over-regulation of cigarettes. These rulings have gone the door wide open to regulation of vaporizer devices. The FDA claims that over-regulation defeats the objective of regulating and controlling the usage of vaporizers.

The fact is that the FDA itself isn’t even necessary to regulate or control these industries. Only state governments have that authority. It is the state governments that impose their own taxes, and many states have imposed increased taxes in order to try to curb smoking. However the state governments are themselves at a disadvantage. They cannot regulate wholesale prices since these prices are regulated by state laws. They also can’t tax the merchandise at a higher rate compared to the federal government does.

Also, the FDA itself is not directly mixed up in manufacturing of the vaporizer. Tobacco companies manufacture their own products, and they are the ones that get sued by the states and levied taxes. The FDA merely approves or denies manufacturer licenses based on whether these manufacturers follow federal law. And when the manufacturer doesn’t, then your company doesn’t get its license.

So, the states that impose taxes on vaporizer devices do not get the benefit of having a federal regulator, or a manufacturer that is licensed by the state. So, instead, they find ways to increase taxes on the manufactures themselves! Which makes no sense. Why are these manufacturers being targeted specifically? There’s no real reason.

The Food and Drug Administration is the federal body in charge of regulating pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements and cosmetics. It gets the power to ban the production or sale of any chemical or substance that it determines is unsafe. So, why are states attempting to tell the FDA to focus on Vaping online users rather than tobacco manufacturers? The FDA knows that regulating diet pills isn’t going to work because there are no controlled weight loss supplements currently available to buy. And, even if there were, they couldn’t force food manufacturers to market diet pills containing things that are banned by state law.

So, instead, the states want to force the FDA to create some type of rule or regulation that will require a manufacturer to market their devices in a specific manner, according to state regulations. That makes no sense at all. In addition, it flies in the face of the original purpose of the Food Drug and Administration Act. Why the FDA is targeting these devices is really a question that only experts in the FDA can answer.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.